In The News
The party starts Thursday October 25, at the historic Ryman Alley at 6 pm, travels to One Eleven, Nashville’s premier rooftop venue, and concludes with a silent auction and live music at the newly restored Silver Dollar Saloon. Proceeds benefit The District, Downtown Nashville’s nonprofit association to promote, preserve and protect the businesses, residents and historic buildings on Lower Broad, Second Avenue and Printer’s Alley.
To learn more about the event and purchase tickets, click here.
For the record, both Sam Sanchez and Will Cheek are strong proponents of the right to bear arms but believe that guns and alcohol do not mix.
He also served on a panel with Rob Robinson, Nissan’s Senior Specialist for Social Media, called “Laughs & Likes: Using User-Generated Content and Comedy to Drive Business & Build Excitement,” where they looked at a real world example in which Nissan invited fans to submit ideas to promote the new 2013 Nissan Pathfinder, then partnered with The Second City comedy troupe to generate improv music videos.
BarCamp is a free, technology-focused “unconference” that is equal parts networking, knowledge-building and fun. BarCamp has become the premier technology and digital event in the city, bringing together the best minds and representations of the hottest companies in the digital, entrepreneurial and software industries, among others.
The Legislature considered curtailing the authority of ABC agents to enforce marijuana laws and eliminate their authority to arrest for criminal drug offenses. This seemingly innocuous change could have been the first step toward eliminating the ABC as a stand-alone agency. The change could have easily impacted the training and pay of ABC agents.
ABC agents have historically been active in marijuana eradication in Tennessee, benefiting from both federal and state funding, and being active in major raids. We presume that marijuana eradication is an important reason behind funding for higher salaries and more-comprehensive training for ABC agents.
The legislation failed this year, but we encourage industry insiders to closely monitor this issue in upcoming legislative sessions. Nationally, many states have considered merging their state ABC into other agencies, largely as a cost saving measure. Liquor experts generally agree that combining ABC functions with other state agencies is bad for the industry. Very bad.
In a heavily regulated industry, having dedicated trained experts in the field is generally seen as a necessary evil. If nothing else, it provides a relatively level playing field for competitors that might otherwise openly break laws to make money, if no one were watching.
With competition driving sales practices, instead of law enforcement, insiders see movement to a more reckless environment that could easily cause major increases in insurance, and eventually to overly restrictive legislative responses. Anyone remember Prohibition?
Eliminating the law enforcement duties of ABC agents simplifies merging the ABC with other state agencies. We saw this as a first step toward eliminating the Tennessee ABC, which from all signs is not good for the alcoholic beverage industry.
As usual, alcohol-induced legislation was popular with the 2012 Tennessee General Assembly. Legislators quaffed mass quantities of liquor legislation. Some made it to the state bar; others fizzled. We distill the most interesting and important beer and liquor laws of the 2012 Session.
This year, some supporters revamped the legislation to allow citizens to vote on wine in grocery stores with a local option election. Local option election is the way that cities, towns and counties decide to allow package stores and liquor-by-the-drink in restaurants.
Local option responded to criticism that the state should not be telling local folks whether Kroger and Mapco could sell wine. The thought was that major cities would legalize wine sales in food stores, based on the popularity of the issue, but that more conservative, generally smaller towns, would not be forced to swallow something that was not palatable to more conservative voters.
The new wine legislation died early in the legislative session. Many observers were not surprised, given the upcoming elections this fall and the fear among incumbents of primaries that almost certainly will focus on conservative values – including an anti-alcohol constituency that remains very important in more rural districts.
In response, the legislature created a huge exception to the ABC prohibition against coupons and other discounts at the retail level. It is now legal for package stores – as well as bars, restaurants and other LBD licenses – to offer discounts, as long as the price is not below wholesale cost.
Specifically struck down are the limitations on case discounts at package stores. There are no case discount rules, as long as the price is not below cost. The impact on LBD could be sweeping, depending on how the ABC harmonizes the new law with existing laws and ABC Regs. For example, the new discount rule appears to allow happy hour beyond 10 pm, which will put considerable pressure on marketing to binge drinkers late at night.
It also opens up the possibility of selling drinks at multiple prices, at the same time, allowing preferred pricing to groups or preferred patrons. Allowing multiple prices on drinks could create headaches for tax collection and new tools for unscrupulous owners to cheat the tax man.
The open-ended discounting law could be this year’s Pandora’s box. PC 947.
• Liquor stores do not have to file a notice with the ABC for each tasting. Retail stores are required to give the ABC an annual notice of intent to conduct tastings, concurrent with renewals. The notice does not have to specify when tastings might occur. The ABC cannot charge a fee for the notice.
• Tastings may be offered at any time the retail liquor store is open for business.
• The size of each sample may not exceed “approximately two ounces” for tastings of wine or high-alcohol beer. Samples of spirits are limited to “approximately one-half ounce.”
• Retail liquor stores are responsible for limiting the number of tastings per customer and the number of products available for tasting.
• A retail licensee or employee of the licensee “may participate” in tastings. The change apparently overrides the general prohibition against licensees and employees drinking on the job.
• A server permit is not required for employees conducting tastings, if the employee has an employee permit for the retail store.
The new legislation does not address whether liquor stores may pair food with tastings, or offer guidance about mixers and other critical details. Keep in mind that liquor stores can only sell liquor, lottery tickets and cash checks. The ABC could easily take the position that since mixers and ice cannot be sold, mixers and ice cannot be used in tastings. Of course, liquor stores cannot sell glassware or Red Solo Cups, which if banned, would complicate tastings.
Although the new law makes it clear that notices are not required for each tasting, the legislation is ambiguous about annual notices. To be safe, we encourage owners to give a general notice of intent to conduct tastings now, and then give the same notice again each time the license is renewed.
Plaintiff’s lawyers could have a field day with the open-ended language allowing stores to set their own policies about how much a consumer can taste, how many samples can be available at any given time and how much alcohol staff consumes while conducting a tasting. We encourage store owners to impose the same controls a responsible restaurant imposes concerning consumption of alcohol. Dram shop liability is a logical concern and owners should have insurance coverage.
Allowing owners and employees to sample wines and spirits at tastings is fraught with danger. For example, what if the tasting lasts all day and the imbibing employee is also selling alcohol at the register. After a tasting, we encourage employees that have sampled alcoholic beverages not to return to regular duty selling wine and spirits. Bottom line, it is apparently legal to be under the influence and sell alcohol, provided the owner or employee is “participating” in a tasting. We say it is a bad idea. PC 947.
Under the new law, in any administrative proceeding where sanctions are imposed, the ABC can be awarded costs. Costs include legal fees for the investigating and prosecuting attorney (generally the ABC Director or Assistant Director), the administrative judge, experts, and agents and other “persons” investigating and prosecuting the charges. Rates were not set, but are required to be “reasonable.”
“Reasonable” legal fees can be horrendously expensive. We expect that the hammer will be especially effective against licensees that try to ignore citations. We do not foresee a change for the vast majority of licensees that respond to citations. PC 1063.
At renewal, the limited service licensee must file a sworn statement of food sales. If the projection in the business plan does not match the percentage in the sworn statement, the restaurant will either retroactively pay the difference between the higher license fee or receive a refund.
Buried in the change is language that arguably strips the ABC of authority to investigate the accuracy of the business plan and sworn statement. This favors the unscrupulous at the expense of honest bar owners. PC 947.
Tennessee’s bucolic farm country is now ripe for wine tastings and sales of farm wines. Farmers can now become farm wine producers. A farm winery grows its own grapes and contracts with a licensed winery to make wine from the grapes and bottle the wine in custom labeling for the farm.
Back on the farm, Farmer Brown can offer tastings of the wine and sell the wine by the bottle, in a separate room. There are no location restrictions, which we read as opening up dry rural areas to wine sales for Farmer Brown. Perhaps the most interesting provision of the farm wine producer law is the omission of the wholesale tier. Wineries can transport wine directly to the farm. Farm wine does not have to pass through wholesalers.
The farm wine law imposes almost no restrictions on sales. Hours are not set and server permits are not required for tastings, for example. The law does not expressly allow a charge for tastings, although the law does not prohibit charging admission to a tour that includes
As expected, a handful of dry restaurants were licensed as a premier type tourist resort and are now able to serve booze. Included are:
1) Catfish Place in Cheatham County. PC 661. 2) Long Branch on Dale Hollow Lake. PC 1005. 3) East Fork Stables. PC 0503. 4) Blue River Resort in Perry County had its license revised. PC 0440.
Cocke County can roll out the red carpet for distilleries. Cocke County, home of world famous moonshiner Popcorn Sutton, is now allowed to have distilleries in their county. PC 515. Four new specific businesses were added to the list of special licenses for LBD:
1. Woodland Golf Club. PC 136. 2. National Ornamental Museum in Memphis. PC 110. 3. Franklin Theater. PC 053. 4. The convention center at Tellico Lake. PC 1035.
We wonder if the change has anything to do with wine in grocery store legislation. We doubt Publix will restrict minors from its stores, if groceries are allowed to sell wine. PC 899.
The law muddied an age-old ABC practice of disregarding crimes resolved by “judicial diversion,” a common way for someone with a good record to dismiss criminal charges after doing community service and avoiding a subsequent arrest for a few months. The new law specifically approved of disregarding non-alcoholic beverage crimes resolved by judicial diversion. By omitting judicial diversion for alcoholic beverage crimes, does the law require the ABC to deny a server permit where a sale to minor was resolved by judicial diversion?
Note that the law does not apply to employee permits for retail liquor stores. Judicial diversion may not be an option for package store clerks. PC 1063.
Another law expands the areas for Sunday 10 am sales to the entire county, where one city has LBD. Counties can opt out by 2/3 vote of the county commission.
We were astonished to see legislation that mentioned Sunday and alcoholic beverages in the same legislation. The general wisdom is that bills that expand the availability of alcoholic beverages on the Lord’s Day are dead on arrival. Perhaps it confirms that Legislators treat beer differently than alcoholic beverages, presumably based on antiquated assumptions that beer poses a lower risk than wine or spirits. Need we remind Legislators that this is an election year? PC 231.
The Legislature created a new Class E felony to manufacture, sell or posses for sale an “imitation controlled substance.” Importantly, the law declares the building where the substance was sold to be a public nuisance. Beer boards should be able to close public nuisances by suspending or revoking beer permits.
It is very difficult to criminalize variations of synthetic drugs. Manufacturers tweak the formula to avoid criminal laws and suddenly have a legal product. With this law, Legislators took a broad approach, seeking to ban all “imitation controlled substances.” Look for court challenges by defendants. PC 843.
• Charities in the Hinterland? Special occasion licenses can now be issued to dry areas of a county that contains at least one city that has LBD. Charities can now hold special events in dry areas of major counties with wine and spirits. The law does not address beer. PC 447.
• Alcohol on Golf Courses Legalized? The premises for a private club now includes the golf course, tennis courts and areas immediately surrounding the swimming pool. Previously, many clubs allowed patrons to imbibe while golfing, but technically, the practice was not legal at most clubs. The law did not legalize duffing with beer and does not apply to for profit clubs.
• Due Process? Legislators developed a pilot program that authorizes the beer boards in Hancock, Union, Grainger, Claiborne, Cocke, Jefferson, Hawkins, Hamilton and Knox counties to suspend or revoke the beer permits if the ABC suspends or revokes alcohol licenses of any establishment. The law is complicated and amends an existing attempt to coordinate prosecution against establishments charged with selling alcohol to patrons under the age of 21. PC 881.
• Report Cards for Beer Boards. Beer boards are required to file yearly reports with statistical information identifying: (a) the number of beer permits issued, (b) information surrounding violations for the sale of beer for off-premises consumption and (c) any penalties imposed by the beer board for these violations. The ABC is required to compile the data and file a report with the Legislature by March 15. Copies of the report are available upon request. We suspect a number of beer boards will ignore the law, saying that the beer board does not have access to the information required pursuant to the law, which is a specific exception to the unfunded mandate. The other problem with this law is constitutional: the law goes far beyond the caption of the bill. PC 964.
• ABC’s High Alcohol Research Project. This law was created in response to the death of an 18 year old from consuming Everclear. This law requires the ABC to research and report information regarding beverages with high alcohol content to state and local government committees by January 30, 2013. New laws may come from this research next year. Stay Tuned? PC 730.
• ABC Regs. The ABC is now required to file a report by March 1 each session covering each new Reg enacted in the previous year and specifying the rationale for the new Reg. PC 947.
• Fines. The ABC is required to state the particular rule or statute in all citations, codifying a process that we believe has been in effect for decades at the ABC. PC 947.
• What’s better than receiving a letter from a loved one in the military? Receiving a bottle of wine with that letter. Tennessee passed a law allowing military men and women overseas to ship wine to Tennessee for personal consumption, but only once, and with a $100 license. PC 968.
• Wholesale Importing Now Legit. The law specifically provides for licensed wholesalers to become importers. Tennessee wholesalers can import wine and spirits from abroad and sell the spirits to other wholesalers throughout the US, with proper federal permitting and an ABC permit. PC 448.
• Jack Trucks. Manufacturers are now allowed to transport product out of state without using common carries. Jack, George and other Tennessee distilleries can use their own trucks to haul spirits out of state. Manufacturers and wineries can also store product at other locations in the county where their manufacturing facility is located. PC 448.
• Nonresident Sellers. The scope of the nonresident seller permit was modified and we encourage holders to view the changes in Section 6 of PC 448. • The exemption for wholesalers selling to out of state wholesalers was reduced from 20 to 10 years. The Attorney General has since thrown out the residency requirement, which makes the law meaningless, in our humble opinion. Read our story here. PC 592.
• High Alc Beer. Beginning at Section 7, Public Chapter 448 cleared up a number of provisions of the high alc beer laws and brewers are encouraged to review the changes. PC 448.
• A bill redefining beer to include beverages with up to 12 % alcohol failed, mostly because of the fiscal impact on the state. High alcohol beverages have a different tax structure, and this would decrease state revenue’s by nearly $800,000 per year, which we think would grow significantly over time. With such a fiscal impact, do not expect to see high gravity beers in gas stations anytime soon.
• Self-checkout beer purchases remain legal. The apparent purpose behind this bill was to prevent minors from using the “swipe and swap” method. This is where someone “swipes” a 12 pack of cokes and “swaps” it for a 12 pack of booze. This failed, primarily because it would be easier for minors to simply steal the beer. Also, almost all grocery stores monitor self-checkout services. The main impact of the law would have made it more inconvenient for the vast majority of purchasers that are of age.
• Another bill with the purpose of protecting minors authorized the commissioner of revenue to revoke business licenses for the illegal sale of synthetic drugs and the local beer boards to revoke the beer license of a business selling such drugs.
• In response to many high profile drinking and driving accidents, investigating officers of fatal traffic accidents involving alcohol would have been required to forward the accident report to the ABC. One of the primary reasons this failed is because it is unnecessary, since the ABC can simply read about high profile drunk driving accidents in the newspaper.
• The ABC will continue to randomly conduct background checks on alcohol permit/license holders, as a bill requiring checks on all holders failed.
• It is currently a Class E felony for persons without a direct shipper’s license to ship alcohol in this state. A law requiring the ABC to contact the Federal Alcohol and tobacco tax trade bureau was introduced, but defeated this year.
• Pick TN/ Don’t Pick TN. Two bills were introduced with the intent of preserving the authenticity of Tennessee alcohol products. The first would have prohibited labeling whiskey, rum, and other “spirits” from being advertised as Tennessee products, unless they were actually distilled in Tennessee. The second required products sold as “Tennessee Wine” or “Tennessee Sour Mash whiskey” to contain a certain percentage of products grown in Tennessee.
We have seen at least one Tennessee-style whiskey that appears to have absolutely no connection to Tennessee – it is not distilled, aged or bottled in Tennessee. This is an issue that probably requires a fix at the federal level, since Tennessee cannot regulate what folks do in other states.
• Wineries - The law in Tennessee will continue to prevent wineries from having more than one location after a bill authorizing satellite locations was defeated. Coincidentally, the sponsors of this bill happen to be from the areas where Arrington Vineyards, (Williamson County) and Tennessee Valley Winery (Loudon County) areas.
*Special thanks to Bone McAllester Norton law clerk Thomas Austin for his assistance with this year’s summary.
Trademark Vigilance Program
Do you know whether or not a new trademark you are about to adopt is likely to cause confusion with the prior trademark of another party? CoreFour will search: State and federal trademark registration records for old, senior marks of others that are likely to cause confusion.
Do you know federally registered trademarks enjoy a right of priority, nationwide in effect, even in markets you have yet to enter? Our services include:
Assistance with all stages of the application process and registration maintenance up to but not including appeals, oppositions, cancellations or interferences.
Do you know whether or not another party has an interest in or is using a trademark that is likely to cause confusion with your trademark? Each month, we will: Monitor state and federal trademark registration records for new, junior marks of others that are likely to cause confusion.
4. INFRINGEMENT INTERVENTION
Do you know you have a duty to protect your trademarks by taking appropriate action to prevent any likelihood of confusion in the mind of the public? Our job is to: Send letters to suspected infringers and forward replies with comments regarding how best to proceed up to but not including litigation.
CoreFour services are available for a fixed monthly fee based on the number of classes of goods and/or services covered by your trademarks. The subscription rate is $150 per class/per month plus expenses. Every trademark covers at least one class of goods or services and sometimes more. Complementary subscription rate estimates are available upon request.
PROACTIVE MONITORING AND PROTECTION OF YOUR MOST IMPORTANT ASSET – YOUR GOOD NAME
In today’s competitive environment where the quality and price playing fields are increasingly level, trademarks are often the only way consumers differentiate one company from another. Consequently, trademarks play a critical role in driving new and repeat business. Many believe registration is enough; however, it is only the beginning. A comprehensive trademark vigilance program is a proactive, ongoing process involving four key steps. CoreFour offers these services at a fixed monthly fee.
HIGH QUALITY, CREATIVE, COMPREHENSIVE, EXPERIENCED
CoreFour is led by Paul Kruse, who has more than 20 years of experience helping individuals and businesses manage their trademark portfolios. While working at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office early in his career, he examined over 4,400 trademark applications and has prosecuted countless applications as a private attorney since. Paul has consistently been one of The Best Lawyers in America® since 2006.
Isn’t it time you got the most out of your trademarks?
To learn more about CoreFour and how it can work for you,
contact us for a complimentary consultation.
Bone McAllester Norton PLLC
“I have known Larry for years. We are pleased to have him join us with his experience in Labor and Employment law, as well as conflict resolution and legal project management,” Mr. Bone said. “He will be a great asset to our clients and our other attorneys, and we welcome him and his clients to the firm.”
Larry is also the Founding Executive Director, Senior Fellow and Associate Professor at the Institute of Conflict Management at Lipscomb University. He recently co-founded a technology company called ERM Legal Solutions that provides legal project management solutions to law firms and legal departments. Larry’s expertise in dispute resolution processes has led to appointments by the American Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section as co-chair of task forces in Health Law and International Dispute Resolution.
He earned his juris doctorate degree in 1978 from Wayne State University Law School and his Bachelor’s degree and Master’s degree from Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan. Larry and his wife, Linda have been married 44 years and have 2 children, Lara and Lance and 5 grandchildren.
Click here to learn more.
Now in its ninth year, Leadership Law is designed to equip Tennessee lawyers with the vision, knowledge and skills necessary to serve as leaders in their profession and local communities.
Bone McAllester Norton is excited to congratulate Rob on this achievement.
To read more, click here.
David Anthony presents “Liens and Security Interests in Tennessee: What Attorneys Must Know.”
This Continuing Legal Education seminar reviews the various types of liens in Tennessee, including consensual liens, judicial liens, statutory liens, and common law liens. Additionally, Mr. Anthony’s presentation includes a discussion of advanced topics, such as dealing with state and federal tax liens and special issues arising under the Bankruptcy Code.
This webinar is presented by M. Lee Smith Publishers and is presented live from 10am to 11am Central. The webinar is also available in CD-Rom format after the seminar date.
David M. Anthony concentrates his practice in the areas of bankruptcy, commercial litigation, creditor’s rights, construction, and lien litigation. Mr. Anthony represents clients throughout middle Tennessee in state, federal, and bankruptcy courts. He also has significant experience representing financial institutions and other creditors in all aspects of the litigation process.
NASHVILLE – Paul W. Kruse, a partner at Bone McAllester Norton PLLC, has been named Best Lawyers’ 2012 Nashville Trademark Law Lawyer of the Year.
“We are extremely proud of Paul’s work and his accomplishments. He is very deserving of this recognition,” said Charles W. Bone, Chairman of Bone McAllester Norton. “Paul is an exceptional attorney and an expert in his field. We’re glad to know that others recognize this as well.”
Best Lawyers compiles its lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. The current, 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in America (2012) is based on more than 3.9 million detailed evaluations of lawyers by other lawyers.
Steven Naifeh, President of Best Lawyers, added: “We continue to believe – as we have believed for more than 25 years – that recognition by one’s peers is the most meaningful form of praise in the legal profession. We would like to congratulate Paul W. Kruse on being selected as the ‘Nashville Best Lawyers Trademark Law Lawyer of the Year’ for 2012.”
Mr. Kruse has more than 20 years of experience in trademark counseling and litigation. While working at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office early in his career, he examined over 4,400 trademark applications and has prosecuted countless applications as a private attorney since. Mr. Kruse has been consistently selected by his peers for inclusion in Best Lawyers since 2006.
Mr. Kruse is an active member of the Intellectual Property Section of the Tennessee Bar Association having acted as Chair on more than one occasion. He is also a member of the Nashville Bar Association, District of Columbia Bar Association, Tennessee Bar Association, and the American Bar Association. He received his bachelor’s degree from Vanderbilt University and his juris doctorate degree from Vanderbilt University School of Law.
The seminars were done over a span of 4-6 weeks allowing all attorneys from the banking and financial practice to share their expertise.
Nashville is known for country music, cowboy hats and a tasty treat that is spreading like wildfire: chicken made hotter than Hades. “Hot Chicken” is a staple in our town and according to Wikipedia, anecdotal evidence suggests that spicy fried chicken has been served in Nashville for generations. Most people think of Prince’s Hot Chicken as the originator of this local delicacy, as the Prince family has been serving it for decades. Music City even hosts a festival devoted entirely to hot chicken on the 4th of July in east Nashville: the Hot Chicken Festival.
The 2012 Hot Chicken Festival is partnering with Nashville Originals, a group of local restaurateurs devoted to sustaining the independent restaurant, to present Hot Chicken Days: 30 Ways to Feel the Burn June 4th-July 4th. Over thirty restaurants will make their own creative version of hot chicken from appetizers, to salads and sides.
Bone McAllester Norton is a fan of Nashville Originals, and Alcoholic Beverage Team Leader Will Cheek regularly speaks to the group about Tennessee’s labyrinth of liquor laws.
Here is a list of some local restaurants featuring hot chicken dishes:
Tin Angel, Jackson's, Rumba, Burger Up, Provence, Jimmy Kelly's, Puckett's, Cha Chah, Suzy Wong's, PM, Nero's, Chago's Cantina, Noshville, Listening Room, Watermark, Sunset Grill, Midtown, McCabe Pub, Holland House, Fido, Copper Kettle, Wild Iris, Yellow Porch, Mambu.
Support your local restaurant scene this month and sample the many takes on Nashville’s historic foodie claim to fame: Hot Chicken.